Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Somersetscott" data-source="post: 597200" data-attributes="member: 10691">Fair enough, I frame my images with the mindset of not having to crop or a very minimal crop. For the 4-6k images I shoot each wedding (over two D750 bodies) anything more than 24mp would be eating through cards like there is no tomorrow and plus the amount of diskspace needed to back up all of the RAWs on the processing side. I guess it is a restriction I am happy to live with at present <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> My 70-200mm f2.8 gets covers enough ground at weddings and a flash gets popped on if the light is low. That said I wish Nikon or Sigma (Art) would make an upto date 135mm prime preferably F1.4.. Ah OK yes I think I read about the AA as a complaint by most reviewers when the D750 came out. Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Somersetscott, post: 597200, member: 10691"] Fair enough, I frame my images with the mindset of not having to crop or a very minimal crop. For the 4-6k images I shoot each wedding (over two D750 bodies) anything more than 24mp would be eating through cards like there is no tomorrow and plus the amount of diskspace needed to back up all of the RAWs on the processing side. I guess it is a restriction I am happy to live with at present :) My 70-200mm f2.8 gets covers enough ground at weddings and a flash gets popped on if the light is low. That said I wish Nikon or Sigma (Art) would make an upto date 135mm prime preferably F1.4.. Ah OK yes I think I read about the AA as a complaint by most reviewers when the D750 came out. Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]

Verification