Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dangerspouse" data-source="post: 708435" data-attributes="member: 46690">I understand what you're saying, and I guess it's just something I've got to get used to. As long as I know it wasn't my technique per se that was lacking, which is what I was worried about (although having said that, in a way I do wish it had been poor technique as that would at least be something I could address concretely).You know what's funny? I also prefer the first picture. They are both excellent shots, but that first one with the red eye and the lighter background is a combo that just grabbed me as soon as I saw it. The white version is just as good technically, but perhaps the fact that it's a sight so often seen by me that it's practically mundane made the difference. But as you say, you prefer that one. So...vive la différence!Thanks very much, Mike <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dangerspouse, post: 708435, member: 46690"] I understand what you're saying, and I guess it's just something I've got to get used to. As long as I know it wasn't my technique per se that was lacking, which is what I was worried about (although having said that, in a way I do wish it had been poor technique as that would at least be something I could address concretely). You know what's funny? I also prefer the first picture. They are both excellent shots, but that first one with the red eye and the lighter background is a combo that just grabbed me as soon as I saw it. The white version is just as good technically, but perhaps the fact that it's a sight so often seen by me that it's practically mundane made the difference. But as you say, you prefer that one. So...[I]vive la différence! [/I]Thanks very much, Mike :) [/QUOTE]

Verification