Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
What defines a "professional" photographer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="theregsy" data-source="post: 30682" data-attributes="member: 4398"><p>Professional for me is much more than money. As others have posted many of us have encountered so called professional photographers that are a complete nightmare, poor attitude, poor personal skills, poor results. To me to be a professional you have to do so much more than make money. When I am working as an amateur or a freelance I am polite, will take the time to explain who I am and what I am doing, even take a little time (if possible) to take the occaisional shot for someone with their camera, it costs nothing to be polite if you claim to be a pro you should act like one. </p><p>The comments about kit always make me laugh, if I won the lottery and bought a Hassleblad then rolled up to the next festival with it I would be no better a phtographer than I am now <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Kit is all well and good but there are people on here who are better photographers than I am, and no matter what kit I had access to they would be both technically and artistically. That gives me something to aim for LOL. But I digress I have seen people charged for 'professional' pictures that I would be ashamed to give away.</p><p>Happy shooting to you all <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="theregsy, post: 30682, member: 4398"] Professional for me is much more than money. As others have posted many of us have encountered so called professional photographers that are a complete nightmare, poor attitude, poor personal skills, poor results. To me to be a professional you have to do so much more than make money. When I am working as an amateur or a freelance I am polite, will take the time to explain who I am and what I am doing, even take a little time (if possible) to take the occaisional shot for someone with their camera, it costs nothing to be polite if you claim to be a pro you should act like one. The comments about kit always make me laugh, if I won the lottery and bought a Hassleblad then rolled up to the next festival with it I would be no better a phtographer than I am now :) Kit is all well and good but there are people on here who are better photographers than I am, and no matter what kit I had access to they would be both technically and artistically. That gives me something to aim for LOL. But I digress I have seen people charged for 'professional' pictures that I would be ashamed to give away. Happy shooting to you all :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
What defines a "professional" photographer
Top