Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
What body next?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fred Kingston_RIP" data-source="post: 554632" data-attributes="member: 10742"><p>As J-see says, there are a lot of variables, and the biggest is low-light... The difference is attributed to noise. Noise is a result of heat. Without getting too technical, sensors are arrays of (for lack of a better word) little light bulbs. The longer the little bulb is receiving current, the more heat the little bulb generates, and subsequently more noise... jamming the same little bulbs into a smaller (DX) package causes that heat to bleed over to the next little bulb, and generate more heat... Spacing the bulbs further apart on the FX sensor, means less heat and less noise... Low-light means longer times, means more noise... (the above uses an analogy for non-technical folks to understand the process)</p><p></p><p>There are a brazzillion web site/videos that demonstrate this phenomenon with comparisons... </p><p></p><p>As J-see points out, there's almost a full stop light difference between the two cameras... and of course, that single fact, I hope wouldn't be the sole criteria for making the change... there are several other factors involved with making the change between DX and FX...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fred Kingston_RIP, post: 554632, member: 10742"] As J-see says, there are a lot of variables, and the biggest is low-light... The difference is attributed to noise. Noise is a result of heat. Without getting too technical, sensors are arrays of (for lack of a better word) little light bulbs. The longer the little bulb is receiving current, the more heat the little bulb generates, and subsequently more noise... jamming the same little bulbs into a smaller (DX) package causes that heat to bleed over to the next little bulb, and generate more heat... Spacing the bulbs further apart on the FX sensor, means less heat and less noise... Low-light means longer times, means more noise... (the above uses an analogy for non-technical folks to understand the process) There are a brazzillion web site/videos that demonstrate this phenomenon with comparisons... As J-see points out, there's almost a full stop light difference between the two cameras... and of course, that single fact, I hope wouldn't be the sole criteria for making the change... there are several other factors involved with making the change between DX and FX... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
What body next?
Top