Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 554542" data-attributes="member: 13196">And I happen to disagree. Like [MENTION=13090]Horoscope Fish[/MENTION] mentioned, sharpening too much in camera (as well as during post processing) creates a halo effect. Been there, done that. Perhaps I am not as tolerant of the effect when pixel peeping as you. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> But then, I tend to shoot RAW as I found the dynamic range of shooting jpegs just didn't cut it for me plus RAW editing allows me more latitude during post processing than jpegs.BUT the OP should try it out and see what works for him/her. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="hark, post: 554542, member: 13196"] And I happen to disagree. Like [MENTION=13090]Horoscope Fish[/MENTION] mentioned, sharpening too much in camera (as well as during post processing) creates a halo effect. Been there, done that. Perhaps I am not as tolerant of the effect when pixel peeping as you. :rolleyes: But then, I tend to shoot RAW as I found the dynamic range of shooting jpegs just didn't cut it for me plus RAW editing allows me more latitude during post processing than jpegs. BUT the OP should try it out and see what works for him/her. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification