Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 261498" data-attributes="member: 14443">crap forgot about the A emblem. that itself is worth a few hundred by itself<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />and thats why we gave them an extra $200 over the nikon. sell it at $600, but $1300? no way. we said it may be better, more complicated but hell sigma has a certain standard and just have recently bumped up their game. doesnt mean im giving them credit. where the hell were they till now? selling soft-shot-open lenses for years. now they think theyre zeiss? $1300 is crazy. they lost 5 sales. Ill buy the nikon and not happy doing it. because of the slow AF. I heard the 1.8G is a bit better so I may go that way. and since I dont even shoot completely wide open it really wont make a difference which I use.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 261498, member: 14443"] crap forgot about the A emblem. that itself is worth a few hundred by itself:) and thats why we gave them an extra $200 over the nikon. sell it at $600, but $1300? no way. we said it may be better, more complicated but hell sigma has a certain standard and just have recently bumped up their game. doesnt mean im giving them credit. where the hell were they till now? selling soft-shot-open lenses for years. now they think theyre zeiss? $1300 is crazy. they lost 5 sales. Ill buy the nikon and not happy doing it. because of the slow AF. I heard the 1.8G is a bit better so I may go that way. and since I dont even shoot completely wide open it really wont make a difference which I use. [/QUOTE]

Verification