Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wev" data-source="post: 587663" data-attributes="member: 16783">Just a continuation of the same saga. When I got it back after the first repair, it was apparent that there was something off in the focus works. It did not have the snap speed to focus it had before and lost focus (ala BIF) easier than my 5300. The oddest thing was that the point of focus in the view finder and the actual point of focus in the image review did not match up -- the latter was always just below the former. This was consistent using all my lens. I checked the focus point in ViewNX and there wasn't one. Nikon confirmed the same in the images I sent. Also, the new view finder unit was off. On a static shot, I would lock focus, but the image in the view finder would be blurry (yes, I had the diopter set). When I took the picture and reviewed it, however, the image was a sharp as can be. After half a dozen phone calls, Nikon finally said send it back.Other than that, it was as good as new.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wev, post: 587663, member: 16783"] Just a continuation of the same saga. When I got it back after the first repair, it was apparent that there was something off in the focus works. It did not have the snap speed to focus it had before and lost focus (ala BIF) easier than my 5300. The oddest thing was that the point of focus in the view finder and the actual point of focus in the image review did not match up -- the latter was always just below the former. This was consistent using all my lens. I checked the focus point in ViewNX and there wasn't one. Nikon confirmed the same in the images I sent. Also, the new view finder unit was off. On a static shot, I would lock focus, but the image in the view finder would be blurry (yes, I had the diopter set). When I took the picture and reviewed it, however, the image was a sharp as can be. After half a dozen phone calls, Nikon finally said send it back. Other than that, it was as good as new. [/QUOTE]

Verification