Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 298832" data-attributes="member: 13196">I misspoke when I said it was a National security law--I meant Homeland Security law--something that was implemented after 9/11. And I believe courthouses are also included on the no-photography list. The thing is I couldn't find any info online; however, when I mentioned this to my chiropractor in his waiting room, another patient spoke up and said her husband (who works for the government) also told her about this law. With Google Earth and 3D maps, what's the point of having this law? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" /> The port authority guy even went as far as telling me questionable online photos get removed by the government yet there are still tons of photos online of the bridge I tried to photograph.I'm just confirming I experienced a similar situation as Sparky, and it was frustrating. On that particular day I wanted to photograph the bridge, the river froze and created an ice jam. A Trenton newspaper published a photo of the bridge with the jammed ice underneath--much to the chagrin of the port authority guy when I told him! Lol! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> During a subsequent storm and different ice jam, I was able to get photos from a different vantage point as were many others--mostly who used cell phones.</blockquote>

Verification