Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikonites
Weekly Photo Challenges
Weekly Challenge Mar. 3 - 9: "M"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="STM" data-source="post: 754491" data-attributes="member: 12827"><p>Milky Way Galaxy. Unfortunately this is still too early in the year to really capture the "core" but it is better than nothing. Most of the EXIF data is lost when you stack images in Deep Sky Stacker. All you get is what is generated by PhotoShop when you post process it. </p><p></p><p>Nikon D850, 15mm f/3.5 AIS Nikkor. (50) 15 sec @ f/3.5 @ ISO 4000 "light" frames and 20 each "dark", "bias" and "flat" frames stacked in DSS and post processed in PS. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]353252[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]353253[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="STM, post: 754491, member: 12827"] Milky Way Galaxy. Unfortunately this is still too early in the year to really capture the "core" but it is better than nothing. Most of the EXIF data is lost when you stack images in Deep Sky Stacker. All you get is what is generated by PhotoShop when you post process it. Nikon D850, 15mm f/3.5 AIS Nikkor. (50) 15 sec @ f/3.5 @ ISO 4000 "light" frames and 20 each "dark", "bias" and "flat" frames stacked in DSS and post processed in PS. [ATTACH=CONFIG]353252._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]353253._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikonites
Weekly Photo Challenges
Weekly Challenge Mar. 3 - 9: "M"
Top