Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Wild Life
Weasel photographed flying on woodpecker's back
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Murray" data-source="post: 424386" data-attributes="member: 9753"><p>Least weasel - <span style="color: #252525"><span style="font-family: 'sans-serif'">Males weigh 36 to 250 g (1.3 to 8.8 oz), while females weigh 29 to 117 g (1.0 to 4.1 oz).</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #252525"><span style="font-family: 'sans-serif'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #252525"><span style="font-family: 'sans-serif'"></span></span><span style="font-family: 'arial'">The weight of a Mars bar has dropped from </span><strong>58g to <strong>51g.</strong></strong></p><p><strong><strong></strong></strong></p><p><strong><strong></strong></strong><span style="color: #252525"><span style="font-family: 'sans-serif'">So it is possible that it was a young Least weasel that was only around 29-80g. So it is possible for this to actually happen. I just find it funny that if it looks unreal then it 'Must' be photoshopped... Why do everyone say that things are photoshopped? Photoshop is a software program and any other programs can edit the same way eg like GIMP. But do we say oh that has been GIMPed or that has been Lightroomed, nope the term is Photoshopped and it is a term that annoys me as many a good photo is referred to as being photoshopped if people are unable to take that photo or just think it is too unreal to be an actual photo always wanting 'proof' that it was actually taken. If I took this photo and people asked for proof that it was legit I would tell them to go get stuffed. I am still one of the rare people that think you can capture a unusual/unreal photo with out the aid of editing software. </span></span></p><p><span style="color: #252525"><span style="font-family: 'sans-serif'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #252525"><span style="font-family: 'sans-serif'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #252525"><span style="font-family: 'sans-serif'"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Murray, post: 424386, member: 9753"] Least weasel - [COLOR=#252525][FONT=sans-serif]Males weigh 36 to 250 g (1.3 to 8.8 oz), while females weigh 29 to 117 g (1.0 to 4.1 oz). [/FONT][/COLOR][FONT=arial]The weight of a Mars bar has dropped from [/FONT][B]58g to [B]51g. [/B][/B][COLOR=#252525][FONT=sans-serif]So it is possible that it was a young Least weasel that was only around 29-80g. So it is possible for this to actually happen. I just find it funny that if it looks unreal then it 'Must' be photoshopped... Why do everyone say that things are photoshopped? Photoshop is a software program and any other programs can edit the same way eg like GIMP. But do we say oh that has been GIMPed or that has been Lightroomed, nope the term is Photoshopped and it is a term that annoys me as many a good photo is referred to as being photoshopped if people are unable to take that photo or just think it is too unreal to be an actual photo always wanting 'proof' that it was actually taken. If I took this photo and people asked for proof that it was legit I would tell them to go get stuffed. I am still one of the rare people that think you can capture a unusual/unreal photo with out the aid of editing software. [/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Wild Life
Weasel photographed flying on woodpecker's back
Top
