Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
Waiting by the waterfall
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marko" data-source="post: 374296" data-attributes="member: 10461"><p>Thanks for the comments. I was just out in a walk when I saw this scene so didn't have tripod with me. I thought for hand held I did alright. </p><p></p><p>I was in Shutter priority at iso 800 which is why the aperture was about high, I think your right iso 200 would have opened the aperture up and give a sharper image. </p><p></p><p>I forgot to say in the original post the lens was at 55mm, do you think that would matter? I would normally be using my 35 prime but had been shooting family earlier and wanted the wider lens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marko, post: 374296, member: 10461"] Thanks for the comments. I was just out in a walk when I saw this scene so didn't have tripod with me. I thought for hand held I did alright. I was in Shutter priority at iso 800 which is why the aperture was about high, I think your right iso 200 would have opened the aperture up and give a sharper image. I forgot to say in the original post the lens was at 55mm, do you think that would matter? I would normally be using my 35 prime but had been shooting family earlier and wanted the wider lens. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Critique
Waiting by the waterfall
Top
