Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
"Voyeur" Photographer Lawsuit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="STM" data-source="post: 183143" data-attributes="member: 12827"><p>Personally I think the judge got it WAY wrong on this one. People <em><strong>DO</strong></em> have a right and an expectation of privacy <em><strong>in their own homes</strong></em>, without some perv with a long lens taking photos of them in potentially embarrasing or compromising situations and without their knowledge in the interest of "art". If you are walking down a public street or are in a public space, you really cannot really have an expectation of privacy but in your own home you most certainly should have. Now the photo in the article shows a man sleeping on his couch with his face completely obscured, not a big deal, but what about (as an example) a woman in her bedroom who has removed her clothes in the process of getting ready for bed and has forgotten to draw the curtains? That is an egregious violation of her privacy. Should she be penailzed or humiliated because she forgot to close her curtains one night and some perve with a long lens happens to see it and snap some photos? That is not art, at least not in my opinion at least.</p><p></p><p>If you ask me the photographer is a creep and probably has a more than few emotional issues. People like that give the rest of us a bad name.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="STM, post: 183143, member: 12827"] Personally I think the judge got it WAY wrong on this one. People [I][B]DO[/B][/I] have a right and an expectation of privacy [I][B]in their own homes[/B][/I], without some perv with a long lens taking photos of them in potentially embarrasing or compromising situations and without their knowledge in the interest of "art". If you are walking down a public street or are in a public space, you really cannot really have an expectation of privacy but in your own home you most certainly should have. Now the photo in the article shows a man sleeping on his couch with his face completely obscured, not a big deal, but what about (as an example) a woman in her bedroom who has removed her clothes in the process of getting ready for bed and has forgotten to draw the curtains? That is an egregious violation of her privacy. Should she be penailzed or humiliated because she forgot to close her curtains one night and some perve with a long lens happens to see it and snap some photos? That is not art, at least not in my opinion at least. If you ask me the photographer is a creep and probably has a more than few emotional issues. People like that give the rest of us a bad name. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
"Voyeur" Photographer Lawsuit
Top