Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
"Voyeur" Photographer Lawsuit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ohkphoto" data-source="post: 183013" data-attributes="member: 1573"><p>The only ones recognizable were the children, and he removed those images and agreed to not have them as part of the exhibit.</p><p></p><p>In today's world of cell cameras, I would bet that there's more than one "unauthorized" photo of you and/or your children somewhere "out there".</p><p></p><p>As far as their being in their "private residence", it doesn't matter. The law is clear that as long as the photographer is in a public place (or his own residence) he doesn't need the subject's permission, and it is legal. May not be ethical, but legal, yes.</p><p></p><p>When you live in a house or apartment with large windows, you set your self up for "voyeurism", whether it's a photographer or a "peeping tom". Curtains were made for a reason . . . I draw mine at night, and I live out in the middle of nowhere . . . but then I'm afraid of things that go "bump in the night."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ohkphoto, post: 183013, member: 1573"] The only ones recognizable were the children, and he removed those images and agreed to not have them as part of the exhibit. In today's world of cell cameras, I would bet that there's more than one "unauthorized" photo of you and/or your children somewhere "out there". As far as their being in their "private residence", it doesn't matter. The law is clear that as long as the photographer is in a public place (or his own residence) he doesn't need the subject's permission, and it is legal. May not be ethical, but legal, yes. When you live in a house or apartment with large windows, you set your self up for "voyeurism", whether it's a photographer or a "peeping tom". Curtains were made for a reason . . . I draw mine at night, and I live out in the middle of nowhere . . . but then I'm afraid of things that go "bump in the night." [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
"Voyeur" Photographer Lawsuit
Top