Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Viltrox compatibility
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eduard" data-source="post: 842348" data-attributes="member: 986"><p>I’ve been curiously watching this from the (Fuji) sidelines. It seems odd to me that Nikon (and Canon) are going down this path. In Fuji-land, the Viltrox lenses are viewed very favorably with a couple approaching stellar comments. The prices tend to be just lower than a used Fuji equivalent which seems to be a sweet spot. I have one of their primes. It does have some trade-offs, noticeable a lack of an aperture ring, but the results are excellent. I hope Nikon and Viltrox can reach an agreement.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eduard, post: 842348, member: 986"] I’ve been curiously watching this from the (Fuji) sidelines. It seems odd to me that Nikon (and Canon) are going down this path. In Fuji-land, the Viltrox lenses are viewed very favorably with a couple approaching stellar comments. The prices tend to be just lower than a used Fuji equivalent which seems to be a sweet spot. I have one of their primes. It does have some trade-offs, noticeable a lack of an aperture ring, but the results are excellent. I hope Nikon and Viltrox can reach an agreement. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Viltrox compatibility
Top
