Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Upgrading tele for wildlife, need suggestions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="singlerosa_RIP" data-source="post: 597916" data-attributes="member: 15556"><p>Hello from a fellow Missourian. </p><p></p><p>While I prefer zooms over primes, the 300 with TC is light compared to any big zoom. Your wallet will be lighter, too. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I've owned the 200-500 since it came out and, while I don't shoot a lot of nature stuff, it seems to be a decent lens. But it is very heavy for prolonged hand-held shooting. Good luck.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]239482[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="singlerosa_RIP, post: 597916, member: 15556"] Hello from a fellow Missourian. While I prefer zooms over primes, the 300 with TC is light compared to any big zoom. Your wallet will be lighter, too. :) I've owned the 200-500 since it came out and, while I don't shoot a lot of nature stuff, it seems to be a decent lens. But it is very heavy for prolonged hand-held shooting. Good luck. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" width="30%"]239482._xfImport[/ATTACH][/CENTER] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Upgrading tele for wildlife, need suggestions
Top