Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jwstl" data-source="post: 135369" data-attributes="member: 12977">I bought the Sigma after reading Thom Hogan's review:[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Positives[/FONT]<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Sharp. Usable even into the corners at f/2.8, very sharp at f/5.6.[/FONT]</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]All the tech. HSM and OS mean this lens gives you more than Nikon does in this focal range, and...[/FONT]</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Priced to sell. This is a far better choice (assuming you get a good sample) than the Nikkor 17-55mm, which is why the Sigma is in my kit and the Nikkor isn't.[/FONT]</li>
</ul>[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]And my images confirm what he says.[/FONT]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jwstl, post: 135369, member: 12977"] I bought the Sigma after reading Thom Hogan's review: [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Times][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=2][B]Positives[/B][/SIZE][/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [LIST] [*][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=2][I]Sharp[/I]. Usable even into the corners at f/2.8, very sharp at f/5.6.[/SIZE][/FONT] [*][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=2][I]All the tech[/I]. HSM and OS mean this lens gives you more than Nikon does in this focal range, and...[/SIZE][/FONT] [*][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=2][I]Priced to sell. [/I]This is a far better choice (assuming you get a good sample) than the Nikkor 17-55mm, which is why the Sigma is in my kit and the Nikkor isn't.[/SIZE][/FONT] [/LIST][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=2]And my images confirm what he says.[/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]

Verification