Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Upgrading FX Wide Lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fortkentdad" data-source="post: 618191" data-attributes="member: 24285"><p>Slept on it - chat with my wife who has been reading the "PhoDOGraphy" book I bought last week - I get to read it when she is done. </p><p></p><p>In the book she tells me the author recommends shooting dogs wide - and since she shoots with the D5100 maybe I should just get a good ultrawide AFC lens. We do have the 16-85 3.5-5.6 that she uses - that is wide, but not ultra. </p><p></p><p>Pulled up a DXO DX Ultrawide comparison <a href="https://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Tokina-AT-X-11-20mm-f-2.8-Pro-DX-Wonderfully-wide/Comparison-Tokina-11-20mm-f-2.8-vs-Nikon-10-24mm-f-3.5-4.5-vs-Sigma-10-20mm-f-3.5" target="_blank">https://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Tokina-AT-X-11-20mm-f-2.8-Pro-DX-Wonderfully-wide/Comparison-Tokina-11-20mm-f-2.8-vs-Nikon-10-24mm-f-3.5-4.5-vs-Sigma-10-20mm-f-3.5</a> </p><p></p><p>ALL the top runners are Tokina - which I've heard a few times in this discussion. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]252656[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The Siggy 10-20 is the least expensive on sale for $550 and scores 18 vs the top runner - the Tokina 11-20 at 20 - but that's close. </p><p></p><p>None of these come close to the Prime on a FX which scores over 30 - on a DX (D7100) it still hits 23. </p><p></p><p>Maybe I'll HAVE to get both the 20mm prime for me and an ultra-wide DX for her . . .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fortkentdad, post: 618191, member: 24285"] Slept on it - chat with my wife who has been reading the "PhoDOGraphy" book I bought last week - I get to read it when she is done. In the book she tells me the author recommends shooting dogs wide - and since she shoots with the D5100 maybe I should just get a good ultrawide AFC lens. We do have the 16-85 3.5-5.6 that she uses - that is wide, but not ultra. Pulled up a DXO DX Ultrawide comparison [URL]https://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Tokina-AT-X-11-20mm-f-2.8-Pro-DX-Wonderfully-wide/Comparison-Tokina-11-20mm-f-2.8-vs-Nikon-10-24mm-f-3.5-4.5-vs-Sigma-10-20mm-f-3.5[/URL] ALL the top runners are Tokina - which I've heard a few times in this discussion. [ATTACH=CONFIG]252656._xfImport[/ATTACH] The Siggy 10-20 is the least expensive on sale for $550 and scores 18 vs the top runner - the Tokina 11-20 at 20 - but that's close. None of these come close to the Prime on a FX which scores over 30 - on a DX (D7100) it still hits 23. Maybe I'll HAVE to get both the 20mm prime for me and an ultra-wide DX for her . . . [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Upgrading FX Wide Lens
Top