Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
Upgraded to D610 from D3300 am I missing something?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blade Canyon" data-source="post: 669464" data-attributes="member: 15302"><p>I thought all of that information was helpful, particularly that both photos are being converted with Adobe Standard. If two camera bodies with manual settings shooting through the same lens are producing final shots that appear to be more than one stop apart in appearance, something's wrong. External light meters would not work at all otherwise. The only thing that makes any sense to me is that the RAW files are being interpreted differently by the software. Both files have sensitivity set to "Recommended Exposure Index."</p><p></p><p>OP, if you boost the exposure slider on the D610 so it looks the same as the D3300, is it noisier? It's possible that both files have all of the same information but are being initially presented differently by the rendering software. </p><p></p><p>The focal plane resolutions are significantly higher on the D3300. ?? Is the D610 shot cropped? You won't see much advantage to a D610 FX shot if you are cropping it back down to DX size. The whole point is to shoot the same area over the entire FX sensor so you get better resolution, more bokeh, and less noise. A D3300 has 24 mp in the DX sized sensor. A D610 has only 10.5 mp in the DX part of the sensor. So don't expect the D610 to outperform the D3300 if you are shooting in DX mode or if you are cropping the D610 shots down to DX size.</p><p></p><p>ETA: D'oh! Of course the D610 has a lower focal plane resolution because it's the same MP spread out over a bigger sensor. My bad...</p><p></p><p>The color temperature is off by 50, but that would not explain the difference in these photos.</p><p></p><p>I look forward to seeing two shots from both bodies using all manual settings, both shots using the whole of the sensor, and both using the exact same lens (though the focal length will have to be different to compare the same scene).</p><p></p><p>ETA: The -1 exp. comp on the 3300 should not make a difference in the output if all settings were manual.</p><p></p><p>ETA again: Both photos show the same Light Value.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blade Canyon, post: 669464, member: 15302"] I thought all of that information was helpful, particularly that both photos are being converted with Adobe Standard. If two camera bodies with manual settings shooting through the same lens are producing final shots that appear to be more than one stop apart in appearance, something's wrong. External light meters would not work at all otherwise. The only thing that makes any sense to me is that the RAW files are being interpreted differently by the software. Both files have sensitivity set to "Recommended Exposure Index." OP, if you boost the exposure slider on the D610 so it looks the same as the D3300, is it noisier? It's possible that both files have all of the same information but are being initially presented differently by the rendering software. The focal plane resolutions are significantly higher on the D3300. ?? Is the D610 shot cropped? You won't see much advantage to a D610 FX shot if you are cropping it back down to DX size. The whole point is to shoot the same area over the entire FX sensor so you get better resolution, more bokeh, and less noise. A D3300 has 24 mp in the DX sized sensor. A D610 has only 10.5 mp in the DX part of the sensor. So don't expect the D610 to outperform the D3300 if you are shooting in DX mode or if you are cropping the D610 shots down to DX size. ETA: D'oh! Of course the D610 has a lower focal plane resolution because it's the same MP spread out over a bigger sensor. My bad... The color temperature is off by 50, but that would not explain the difference in these photos. I look forward to seeing two shots from both bodies using all manual settings, both shots using the whole of the sensor, and both using the exact same lens (though the focal length will have to be different to compare the same scene). ETA: The -1 exp. comp on the 3300 should not make a difference in the output if all settings were manual. ETA again: Both photos show the same Light Value. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
Upgraded to D610 from D3300 am I missing something?
Top