Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vincent" data-source="post: 395014" data-attributes="member: 15675">I wonder what? Obviously all measurement is biassed to what they are looking for (scientists will only find what they are looking for, not what is).DXO Mark is clearly biassed towards studio photography, base ISO performance.Senscore makes more sense having the D4s, D4, Df as the best performers, for that they look more at the evolution throughout the ISO. Seems to push FF a lot.One thing that shocked me is the poor score of my D7000, however I did expect it to be outperformed by the D3300 and D5300 in IQ.I`ll post my analysis later, but it shows that the D750 is good nor bad at anything, the great thing about it is how average it is and that it has no issues with anything. Just to come to the recent discussion, a D600/D610 is sufficient, if you do not need the extras of the D750. The D750 will be bought by a lot of people that could do well with a D610.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vincent, post: 395014, member: 15675"] I wonder what? Obviously all measurement is biassed to what they are looking for (scientists will only find what they are looking for, not what is). DXO Mark is clearly biassed towards studio photography, base ISO performance. Senscore makes more sense having the D4s, D4, Df as the best performers, for that they look more at the evolution throughout the ISO. Seems to push FF a lot. One thing that shocked me is the poor score of my D7000, however I did expect it to be outperformed by the D3300 and D5300 in IQ. I`ll post my analysis later, but it shows that the D750 is good nor bad at anything, the great thing about it is how average it is and that it has no issues with anything. Just to come to the recent discussion, a D600/D610 is sufficient, if you do not need the extras of the D750. The D750 will be bought by a lot of people that could do well with a D610. [/QUOTE]

Verification