Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vincent" data-source="post: 366801" data-attributes="member: 15675">Finally found some measurements:<a href="http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/reviews/dslrs/nikon-d750-hands-review/4" target="_blank">Nikon D750 Review - Page 4 of 6 - Amateur Photographer</a>Sadly the Df and the D610 reviews do not have the charts: but here is D750 [ATTACH]118322[/ATTACH]vs D4s[ATTACH]118324[/ATTACH]vs D810[ATTACH]118323[/ATTACH]It shows the D750 is a very strong performer, but the high ISO outperforming D810 seems unlikely from this chart. DXO mark gives the D810 at base ISO a lot higher, which seems more realistic, so these charts seem to have some (other) bias you have to corroborate with other proof to form an opinion.DXO example:[ATTACH]118325[/ATTACH]I also seems to confirm the usability till 6400 ISO. Where this states little about noise from what I have seen a score above 8EV is needed to get results directly usable on internet.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vincent, post: 366801, member: 15675"] Finally found some measurements: [URL="http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/reviews/dslrs/nikon-d750-hands-review/4"]Nikon D750 Review - Page 4 of 6 - Amateur Photographer[/URL] Sadly the Df and the D610 reviews do not have the charts: but here is D750 [ATTACH=CONFIG]118322[/ATTACH] vs D4s [ATTACH=CONFIG]118324[/ATTACH] vs D810 [ATTACH=CONFIG]118323[/ATTACH] It shows the D750 is a very strong performer, but the high ISO outperforming D810 seems unlikely from this chart. DXO mark gives the D810 at base ISO a lot higher, which seems more realistic, so these charts seem to have some (other) bias you have to corroborate with other proof to form an opinion. DXO example: [ATTACH=CONFIG]118325._xfImport[/ATTACH] I also seems to confirm the usability till 6400 ISO. Where this states little about noise from what I have seen a score above 8EV is needed to get results directly usable on internet. [/QUOTE]

Verification