Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bingo76" data-source="post: 844910" data-attributes="member: 53631">Thanks for this. You're right I should have used a tripod, this could well be camera shake.I'd done a lot of research about this lens - probably too much, maybe I was hoping for more lolI'd actually shared my concerns with Perplexity (AI) a month or so back, and it took me through very similar steps. including setting up a tripod and taking picture of an ISO 12233 resolution test chart. I then sent these pictures back and it suggested the lens was fine - it seemed ok to me. I also did the fine tune tweaking as you suggested - for this lens I think my setting is -2 which gives the sharpest image.Maybe I need to improve my camera holding position for group shots - I'm always shooting at 1:1600 / 2000 for my sports shots, so its never an issue there. As I say I just have this nagging feeling the lens isn't as it should be, hence why trying to get other more qualified opinions!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bingo76, post: 844910, member: 53631"] Thanks for this. You're right I should have used a tripod, this could well be camera shake. I'd done a lot of research about this lens - probably too much, maybe I was hoping for more lol I'd actually shared my concerns with Perplexity (AI) a month or so back, and it took me through very similar steps. including setting up a tripod and taking picture of an ISO 12233 resolution test chart. I then sent these pictures back and it suggested the lens was fine - it seemed ok to me. I also did the fine tune tweaking as you suggested - for this lens I think my setting is -2 which gives the sharpest image. Maybe I need to improve my camera holding position for group shots - I'm always shooting at 1:1600 / 2000 for my sports shots, so its never an issue there. As I say I just have this nagging feeling the lens isn't as it should be, hence why trying to get other more qualified opinions! [/QUOTE]

Verification