Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Unexpected price for news article
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="skater" data-source="post: 411209" data-attributes="member: 19158"><p>That happens in the US, too, though it's rare. For example, when Shenandoah NP was opened, there were still a few people living on the land that refused to be kicked out. Also, I know a guy that lives in a similar situation: It's private land, but the only way to get to it without a boat or a helicopter is to drive through a national park. It was all kinds of fun for him when the government was shut down a few years back.</p><p></p><p>On topic: I'm glad it came to a friendly resolution. Setting aside the unusual situation of living in the national park, I understand why the parks charge professional photographers, but hobbyists and semi-pros get caught up in the wash. When the law is passed, the politicians are probably thinking about "big shot" Hollywood money, and the fee would just be a cost of doing business.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="skater, post: 411209, member: 19158"] That happens in the US, too, though it's rare. For example, when Shenandoah NP was opened, there were still a few people living on the land that refused to be kicked out. Also, I know a guy that lives in a similar situation: It's private land, but the only way to get to it without a boat or a helicopter is to drive through a national park. It was all kinds of fun for him when the government was shut down a few years back. On topic: I'm glad it came to a friendly resolution. Setting aside the unusual situation of living in the national park, I understand why the parks charge professional photographers, but hobbyists and semi-pros get caught up in the wash. When the law is passed, the politicians are probably thinking about "big shot" Hollywood money, and the fee would just be a cost of doing business. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Unexpected price for news article
Top