Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
UK's Instagram Act . . . BEWARE!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lee" data-source="post: 147225" data-attributes="member: 8142"><p>It's one thing saying that 'orphan images' are a free for all, but if they insist on taking that approach, it would only be fair (not remotely suggesting that it is okay to begin with however) that there was some sort of legislation prohibiting these large organizations (or anyone for that matter) from automatically stripping data from uploaded images; it should then be up to the rightful owner of the work to decide whether they wish to have the opt in/opt out option to have data retained/removed. But I guess that is asking too much! </p><p></p><p>The reality today is, if you post an image anywhere accessible to anyone, it is at risk of being used with or without permission. But it truly is a sad day when it becomes official legislation that (in almost as many words) anything that you create has to be hidden and hoarded because in sharing with anyone, it is fair game and up for grabs to be claimed by someone else. </p><p></p><p>While watermarks won't stop anyone from taking an image, it does at least make then have to work for it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lee, post: 147225, member: 8142"] It's one thing saying that 'orphan images' are a free for all, but if they insist on taking that approach, it would only be fair (not remotely suggesting that it is okay to begin with however) that there was some sort of legislation prohibiting these large organizations (or anyone for that matter) from automatically stripping data from uploaded images; it should then be up to the rightful owner of the work to decide whether they wish to have the opt in/opt out option to have data retained/removed. But I guess that is asking too much! The reality today is, if you post an image anywhere accessible to anyone, it is at risk of being used with or without permission. But it truly is a sad day when it becomes official legislation that (in almost as many words) anything that you create has to be hidden and hoarded because in sharing with anyone, it is fair game and up for grabs to be claimed by someone else. While watermarks won't stop anyone from taking an image, it does at least make then have to work for it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
UK's Instagram Act . . . BEWARE!!
Top