Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
UK's Instagram Act . . . BEWARE!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 143260" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>Unfortunately, I can go to Flickr and look at all the resized versions of any of my photos and the EXIF data is stripped from each and every one of them, meaning that even though I have a version out there with my copyright embedded in the EXIF data, there are a handful of copies, produced whenever anything is uploaded to Flickr, that have that EXIF data stripped. So if you're willing to work with a "Large" file instead of my original, then technically there are 5-15 "orphan works" ON flickr for every well documented and copyrighted version of my photos. That's been a concern of mine for a while, and this has me ready to yank everything off of there. </p><p></p><p>What really gets me is that these same large companies will sue the pants off of anyone who dares borrow even a second of a song or an smidgen of an idea from a work that they own, even though the thing they based it on was "borrowed" from public domain or a previously expired copyrighted work (cough, cough, Disney, cough).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 143260, member: 9240"] Unfortunately, I can go to Flickr and look at all the resized versions of any of my photos and the EXIF data is stripped from each and every one of them, meaning that even though I have a version out there with my copyright embedded in the EXIF data, there are a handful of copies, produced whenever anything is uploaded to Flickr, that have that EXIF data stripped. So if you're willing to work with a "Large" file instead of my original, then technically there are 5-15 "orphan works" ON flickr for every well documented and copyrighted version of my photos. That's been a concern of mine for a while, and this has me ready to yank everything off of there. What really gets me is that these same large companies will sue the pants off of anyone who dares borrow even a second of a song or an smidgen of an idea from a work that they own, even though the thing they based it on was "borrowed" from public domain or a previously expired copyrighted work (cough, cough, Disney, cough). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
UK's Instagram Act . . . BEWARE!!
Top