Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 387335" data-attributes="member: 31330">Scratch that for the D750.I just put it to the test. Even while I can use exposure compensation in manual mode and it says so for the shots in the EXIF data, it does exactly nothing. So in manual I have the illusion of compensation. I guess that's something. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />When maxing out the timer in aperture mode, about the same is true for the D750 and the change between 0 and +5EV is that minimal I blame it on slightly moving the cam.I have to check and test the D3300 again since I remember it being different for that one.Edit;And the same is true for the D3300. When maxed out EV doesn't do anything which means I was wrong and the RAW data collected isn't permanently affected by the lightmeter and depends purely on A/S.I guess we learned another thing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="J-see, post: 387335, member: 31330"] Scratch that for the D750. I just put it to the test. Even while I can use exposure compensation in manual mode and it says so for the shots in the EXIF data, it does exactly nothing. So in manual I have the illusion of compensation. I guess that's something. ;) When maxing out the timer in aperture mode, about the same is true for the D750 and the change between 0 and +5EV is that minimal I blame it on slightly moving the cam. I have to check and test the D3300 again since I remember it being different for that one. Edit; And the same is true for the D3300. When maxed out EV doesn't do anything which means I was wrong and the RAW data collected isn't permanently affected by the lightmeter and depends purely on A/S. I guess we learned another thing. [/QUOTE]

Verification