Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3300
two questions re: manual focus and viewfinder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 387322" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>The light-metering in digital cams still gets me. I wonder why they have to finalize the exposure adjustments done according the lightmeter.</p><p></p><p>The data my sensor collects is only affected by two things: aperture and shutter speed. Regardless how I meter or what I compensate, this data remains identical. Yet when I overexpose a shot and the underexpose an identical one while using the same aperture and shutter, after normalizing the exposure of both in post, they should be pixel-identical. That's what I expect when RAW collects pure data. In my experience this is not true which implies the lightmeter affects the values of the data when stored.</p><p></p><p>That's exactly the thing that bugs me. I see no logical reason why this has to be done as a permanent adjustment to the RAW file. Why can't it, just like WB or saturation, be done as a digital post-manipulation?</p><p></p><p>Now it appears the lightmeter turns exposure a bit into something like JPEG mode.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 387322, member: 31330"] The light-metering in digital cams still gets me. I wonder why they have to finalize the exposure adjustments done according the lightmeter. The data my sensor collects is only affected by two things: aperture and shutter speed. Regardless how I meter or what I compensate, this data remains identical. Yet when I overexpose a shot and the underexpose an identical one while using the same aperture and shutter, after normalizing the exposure of both in post, they should be pixel-identical. That's what I expect when RAW collects pure data. In my experience this is not true which implies the lightmeter affects the values of the data when stored. That's exactly the thing that bugs me. I see no logical reason why this has to be done as a permanent adjustment to the RAW file. Why can't it, just like WB or saturation, be done as a digital post-manipulation? Now it appears the lightmeter turns exposure a bit into something like JPEG mode. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3300
two questions re: manual focus and viewfinder
Top