Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
Truth In Photography
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 219016" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>No issue with them whatsoever, and to be clear I have no issue with any use of any technology when it's passed as "art" and not as journalism. </p><p></p><p>In almost all cases the tools you mention are still used to capture "a single moment". In most of these cases it's going to be a matter of nothing being added to the image other than "more light information", and in some cases in HDR ghost reduction could remove extra information, but it's still a view of a moment, albeit across moments. If anything other than light is significantly altered I would want it to be mentioned, and in particular if the photo is presumed to be a journalistic representation of an event, or if it is, say, entered in a contest that prohibits such manipulation specifically, then I would consider this a breach of ethics.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 219016, member: 9240"] No issue with them whatsoever, and to be clear I have no issue with any use of any technology when it's passed as "art" and not as journalism. In almost all cases the tools you mention are still used to capture "a single moment". In most of these cases it's going to be a matter of nothing being added to the image other than "more light information", and in some cases in HDR ghost reduction could remove extra information, but it's still a view of a moment, albeit across moments. If anything other than light is significantly altered I would want it to be mentioned, and in particular if the photo is presumed to be a journalistic representation of an event, or if it is, say, entered in a contest that prohibits such manipulation specifically, then I would consider this a breach of ethics. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
Truth In Photography
Top
