Truman

Katie1987

Senior Member
20121227-DSC_0035.jpg

D5100, 50 mm
ISO640
f/1.8
1/60


I wanted to capture the texture of his fur and the intensity of his face while he was partially napping. Our dog gets a lot of compliments from people because of his coloring and the softness of his fur coat so I like to incorporate those elements when I'm shooting him. I was fairly close to him during this shot, maybe no more than 1.5 ft away. I did a little bit of post-processing in Lightroom after I took the shot.
 

Ruidoso Bill

Senior Member
Handsome looking dog you have there. I notice that the focus point is half way down his nose. I would have either increased the f stops to allow for a greater DOF or focused on his eyes. Just my preference.
 

Katie1987

Senior Member
Bill - thanks for the critique, that was one thing that I was debating on in this photo (where to focus). I think I'll play around with him some more and see if I get a better effect focusing either on his nose or more closer to his eyes.

Thanks again!
 

Rick M

Senior Member
I agree with Bill. With such shallow DoF, I would put it on the eyes. I like the composition and exposure, but I think with a shot like this you are going to need enough Dof to keep the nose to eyes area sharp.
 

Eye-level

Banned
Get aimed at the eyes while the lens is wide open...when you get focus lock very carefully, without removing your eye from the viewfinder, stop the lens down to 4 or maybe 5.6. Know what the shutter speed speed at whatever stop is going to be and set it there in anticipation of your f stop adjustment...the idea is to keep the camera movements to a minimum. Breathe in and pause for a second after you exhale. Use the fatty part of your finger rather than the tip to fire the shutter. Then you can take another breath. :)

Get off of the wide open 1.8 stuff. You'll be surprised what 4 and 5.6 will do. A dog typically has a long face so you need the room. 1.8 will NEVER give you the room you need. With this shot you were in real tight and really sort of pushed the lens beyond it envelope. Back off and stop down and I think you'll be impressed with what you come up with there. His whole mug will be razor sharp and everything else will be soft. Once you blur the edges of his ears and get the exposure to where it is just shy of being overexposed you'll have a keeper then.

Now you will hear it said time and time again that 50 is uncomfortable on a DX body. I have even said it myself. And it is true too! Here is the deal - as long as you don't try group portraits or things that are big like cars you can use the 50. The situations that work are half body portraits of a single soul (or almost up to bust type stuff) or details on a car or close range landscape stuff like a tree for instance.
 
Last edited:

Eye-level

Banned
I still do the same thing to this day Katie. For example this picture which I made just a few days ago. D5000 and 105/2.5 I had to shoot it 2.5 wide open to get the histogram but I lost it DOF wise. It would have been a better picture stopped down. Low light room light and a baby and I don't like flashing babies because it freaks them out...natural light only...hard to get everything to line up sometimes!

 

Katie1987

Senior Member
Jeff -- thanks for your advice! I'm wondering if I should scrap the 50mm in my bag and go with a 35mm or something else, seems like it's giving me more hassle than I bargained for. I always have to take a little bit longer to compose the shot with it and get the proper focus with that prime lens.

I'll increase my f stop first and play around with that for awhile.
 
Top