Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Tripod Collar for the 70-200mm f/4
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 227596" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>I got the f4 for much the same reason as Rick, I didn't want to carry that weight around, and with a D600 I have no problem ratcheting the ISO up one stop to make up for the lack of a stop on the lens. I very rarely shoot wide open. Unless you're talking very dim rooms I'm thinking the lens would do fine for weddings. People rave about the sharpness of the 2.8, but I find that kind of hype, deserved or otherwise, somehow casts every other lens in the very undeserving "not sharp enough" category, and that's far from the truth. </p><p></p><p>I absolutely love my "Unholy Trinity" - the 16-35mm f/4, 24-120mm f/4 and 70-200mm f/4. For what I paid for those I'd still be saving for lens #2 in the f/2.8 set, but I'm out there shooting with all of them, and more importantly don't feel like I'm missing a thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 227596, member: 9240"] I got the f4 for much the same reason as Rick, I didn't want to carry that weight around, and with a D600 I have no problem ratcheting the ISO up one stop to make up for the lack of a stop on the lens. I very rarely shoot wide open. Unless you're talking very dim rooms I'm thinking the lens would do fine for weddings. People rave about the sharpness of the 2.8, but I find that kind of hype, deserved or otherwise, somehow casts every other lens in the very undeserving "not sharp enough" category, and that's far from the truth. I absolutely love my "Unholy Trinity" - the 16-35mm f/4, 24-120mm f/4 and 70-200mm f/4. For what I paid for those I'd still be saving for lens #2 in the f/2.8 set, but I'm out there shooting with all of them, and more importantly don't feel like I'm missing a thing. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Tripod Collar for the 70-200mm f/4
Top