Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="eurotrash" data-source="post: 152296" data-attributes="member: 9237">if you can afford it, the 24-70 f2.8 would be my choice. I'm saving for one now.It's the most versatile&nbsp; great in low light and you will likely never need to upgrade. It will replace countless primes and its an amazing looking piece of glass. Take a faster prime as well, possibly a 50 1.4 with you and you're ALL set.Remember, you can always shoot a panorama at 24mm if you need wider coverage (24 on FF is wide anyhow!) and if you need to get closer, you could probably do that. I feel like everything in Asia is pretty condensed so you won't have issues reaching out and touching a subject with the 70mm reach. my opinion of course. Just don't take a bag full of crap, it'll weigh you down and start to annoy you quick! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="eurotrash, post: 152296, member: 9237"] if you can afford it, the 24-70 f2.8 would be my choice. I'm saving for one now. It's the most versatile great in low light and you will likely never need to upgrade. It will replace countless primes and its an amazing looking piece of glass. Take a faster prime as well, possibly a 50 1.4 with you and you're ALL set. Remember, you can always shoot a panorama at 24mm if you need wider coverage (24 on FF is wide anyhow!) and if you need to get closer, you could probably do that. I feel like everything in Asia is pretty condensed so you won't have issues reaching out and touching a subject with the 70mm reach. my opinion of course. Just don't take a bag full of crap, it'll weigh you down and start to annoy you quick! :p [/QUOTE]

Verification