Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dangerspouse" data-source="post: 770538" data-attributes="member: 46690">Hi Fred. Thanks for the input. I rarely use the Sharpness slider. Only occasionally in the 4-way comparison screen, making all 4 the same mode (Low-Light, Clear, etc.) and moving the sharpness and Restore Details sliders around so I can compare how the different levels look. Very often, most times really, I find the program's AI does the best job and I leave it as recommended.&nbsp;Such was the case here. I didn't adjust sharpness at all. I think perhaps in retrospect this may have been a poor example to post because this particular picture has so much fine detail that everything was perceived as noise, and so over sharpened as part of the processing. More sharpening than I may have done in Lightroom alone, certainly. I imagine that had all the foliage in this pic been a body of water or some other more-or-less homogeneous expanse, it would have been a better showcase.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dangerspouse, post: 770538, member: 46690"] Hi Fred. Thanks for the input. I rarely use the Sharpness slider. Only occasionally in the 4-way comparison screen, making all 4 the same mode (Low-Light, Clear, etc.) and moving the sharpness and Restore Details sliders around so I can compare how the different levels look. Very often, most times really, I find the program's AI does the best job and I leave it as recommended. Such was the case here. I didn't adjust sharpness at all. I think perhaps in retrospect this may have been a poor example to post because this particular picture has so much fine detail that [U]everything[/U] was perceived as noise, and so over sharpened as part of the processing. More sharpening than I may have done in Lightroom alone, certainly. I imagine that had all the foliage in this pic been a body of water or some other more-or-less homogeneous expanse, it would have been a better showcase. [/QUOTE]

Verification