Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
:: Too Good to be True? ::
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 596878" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>I'd be desperately interested to see what the unprocessed raw file looks like. I remember when the D750 came out and one of the first photographers with it shot something that was (IIRC) 7 to 9 stops underexposed and then adjusted the exposure in post showing not just details but proper colors. If that advanced consumer level sensor can do that it's not hard to convince me that advances since could manage to capture even more detail and color in underexposed images. </p><p></p><p>In other words, if the guy is telling you these shots are SOOC then I call BS. But I buy that it's <em><strong>possible</strong></em> that he was able to pull them off in post from severely underexposed images.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 596878, member: 9240"] I'd be desperately interested to see what the unprocessed raw file looks like. I remember when the D750 came out and one of the first photographers with it shot something that was (IIRC) 7 to 9 stops underexposed and then adjusted the exposure in post showing not just details but proper colors. If that advanced consumer level sensor can do that it's not hard to convince me that advances since could manage to capture even more detail and color in underexposed images. In other words, if the guy is telling you these shots are SOOC then I call BS. But I buy that it's [I][B]possible[/B][/I] that he was able to pull them off in post from severely underexposed images. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
:: Too Good to be True? ::
Top