Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hrphotography" data-source="post: 318180" data-attributes="member: 12231">Thank you Rick. It all started when i saw some awesome images (very very sharp) by a photographer. I asked him about the lens, he told me it was Tokina 16-28 2.8 ($625) and per him that lens is comparable to Nikon 14-24 ($1900). Even if it was close, was good enough for me, as for wide angle i only have 20mm 2.8 which is OK (i was never impressed by its sharpness even at f8).&nbsp; I was about to buy the Tokina 16-28 when i saw another Tokina 17-35 f4 for FX also. That appealed to me more since it was slightly cheaper ($500), smaller, lighter and accepts filters. So i wanted to ask on this forum if anyone had experience with this particular tokina s. 20mm is wide enough for me, but if i can have a sharper lens (with some zoom perhaps) in my budget ($500-700) i would take it <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="hrphotography, post: 318180, member: 12231"] Thank you Rick. It all started when i saw some awesome images (very very sharp) by a photographer. I asked him about the lens, he told me it was Tokina 16-28 2.8 ($625) and per him that lens is comparable to Nikon 14-24 ($1900). Even if it was close, was good enough for me, as for wide angle i only have 20mm 2.8 which is OK (i was never impressed by its sharpness even at f8). I was about to buy the Tokina 16-28 when i saw another Tokina 17-35 f4 for FX also. That appealed to me more since it was slightly cheaper ($500), smaller, lighter and accepts filters. So i wanted to ask on this forum if anyone had experience with this particular tokina s. 20mm is wide enough for me, but if i can have a [B]sharper[/B] lens (with some zoom perhaps) in my budget ($500-700) i would take it :) [/QUOTE]

Verification