Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
To FX or not to FX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deuce808" data-source="post: 501542" data-attributes="member: 39784"><p>I recently acquired 2/3rds of the holy trinity at a price that allows me to think about a new body to keep up with them. The lenses I got are the 24-70 2.8 and the 70-200 2.8 vr1. They instantly produced more contrast, less flare, and better subject isolation (in the case of the 70-200) while allowing better images in low light. I've moved my 18-140 g and 70-300 g to travel/day trip status. While I am satisfied with having 2 gripped 7000s I was wondering if stepping up to a 610 would produce better IQ, allow lower ISOs, and a better overall experience with the pro glass? Will the higher MP count really show any sloppy handling skills? Will it even give me any real world benefits? Should I just save up for a better body? Right now there's a 610 for $1000 on CL and a 800 at a local shop for $1500. At $1500 I could probably snag a 750 at rebate time or even a used d3s a friend in selling. Just some random thoughts running through my mind. I also got a question about the 14-24 but I'll ask in that forum.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deuce808, post: 501542, member: 39784"] I recently acquired 2/3rds of the holy trinity at a price that allows me to think about a new body to keep up with them. The lenses I got are the 24-70 2.8 and the 70-200 2.8 vr1. They instantly produced more contrast, less flare, and better subject isolation (in the case of the 70-200) while allowing better images in low light. I've moved my 18-140 g and 70-300 g to travel/day trip status. While I am satisfied with having 2 gripped 7000s I was wondering if stepping up to a 610 would produce better IQ, allow lower ISOs, and a better overall experience with the pro glass? Will the higher MP count really show any sloppy handling skills? Will it even give me any real world benefits? Should I just save up for a better body? Right now there's a 610 for $1000 on CL and a 800 at a local shop for $1500. At $1500 I could probably snag a 750 at rebate time or even a used d3s a friend in selling. Just some random thoughts running through my mind. I also got a question about the 14-24 but I'll ask in that forum. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D600/D610
To FX or not to FX
Top