Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Time For 2.8 but?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="singlerosa_RIP" data-source="post: 471685" data-attributes="member: 15556"><p>I used the 17-55 on my D7000 for 2 years before adding the D600 and swapping it for a 24-70. Great lens on DX. From 24-55 it should outperform the 24-85. Plus you'd have some wide angle capabilities that you don't have now. Good used copies are available for under $1K. I sold my 17-55 for $850 on this site. It was mint.</p><p></p><p>Have no experience with the Tamron, but if you're looking to stay in the 24-70 range and keep it under $1K.......</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="singlerosa_RIP, post: 471685, member: 15556"] I used the 17-55 on my D7000 for 2 years before adding the D600 and swapping it for a 24-70. Great lens on DX. From 24-55 it should outperform the 24-85. Plus you'd have some wide angle capabilities that you don't have now. Good used copies are available for under $1K. I sold my 17-55 for $850 on this site. It was mint. Have no experience with the Tamron, but if you're looking to stay in the 24-70 range and keep it under $1K....... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Time For 2.8 but?
Top