Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="premc44" data-source="post: 7133" data-attributes="member: 2452"><p>f you don't want to go for the expensive Nikon 60mm f/2.8, a cheaper but a very reasonable alternative is the Sigma 50mm f2.8 macro, which I have been using for over an year now. The photos that I have posted on the macro shots in critique forum have been taken with that lens. A longer focal length macro lens has its advantages, but becomes more expensive. The Sigma lens, I found quite useful for objects like flowers, where you can go in close and with a tripod, it yields good results. One of my photos taken with this lens is attached to this post[ATTACH]635[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>