Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Thoughts on a lightweight ballhead for hiking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="desmobob" data-source="post: 776950" data-attributes="member: 45742"><p>Appropriate! I happened to bring up that lens and the AF-S 50mm f/1.8G on DXOMark for comparison. The 35mm is actually sharper throughout the aperture range. I've learned to take the DXOMark stuff with a grain of salt sometimes (one of my all-time favorite lenses, the AF-D 180mm f/2.8 is a good example) but it's nice to feel that I made a good choice. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Funny thing... that 50mm f/1.8G is another example of DXOMark weirdness. It shows higher MTF numbers across the range than the 1.4G and similar distortion, etc., but they rave about the 1.4G and give the 1.8G a kind of ho-hum review.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, all this talk about lightening up my hiking load is just daydreaming as I sit inside on a 6˚F and windy day here in northern NY. But I do plan on bringing out my D200 on an ice fishing outing tomorrow...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="desmobob, post: 776950, member: 45742"] Appropriate! I happened to bring up that lens and the AF-S 50mm f/1.8G on DXOMark for comparison. The 35mm is actually sharper throughout the aperture range. I've learned to take the DXOMark stuff with a grain of salt sometimes (one of my all-time favorite lenses, the AF-D 180mm f/2.8 is a good example) but it's nice to feel that I made a good choice. :) Funny thing... that 50mm f/1.8G is another example of DXOMark weirdness. It shows higher MTF numbers across the range than the 1.4G and similar distortion, etc., but they rave about the 1.4G and give the 1.8G a kind of ho-hum review. Anyway, all this talk about lightening up my hiking load is just daydreaming as I sit inside on a 6˚F and windy day here in northern NY. But I do plan on bringing out my D200 on an ice fishing outing tomorrow... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Thoughts on a lightweight ballhead for hiking?
Top