Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="gustafson" data-source="post: 495136" data-attributes="member: 40735">OK, so I was wrong about the sharpness on the 35mm for distant objects. I went back and redid the crop, and to my eyes the 35mm is not exactly the slouch that I made it out to be in my earlier post. The first pic is a 100% crop of the scene shot with the 35mm, and the second is the shot with the 55-200, except saved in less than max resolution so I could upload here. The 35mm crop is noticeably brighter and less grainy, but that is because it was shot at f/1.8 and 900 ISO. The 55-200 shot was at the max ISO of 12800 at 200mm and f/5.6. Now I see why people fawn over the 35mm prime![ATTACH]180477[/ATTACH][ATTACH]180478[/ATTACH]</blockquote>