Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3300
Thoughts on 55-200 DX VR lens?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gustafson" data-source="post: 494975" data-attributes="member: 40735"><p>OMG [USER=27586]@hrstrat57[/USER], you slay me! @<a href="http://nikonites.com/member-9252-steveh.html" target="_blank">SteveH</a>, thanks for the heads up on the weight not being that big an issue.</p><p></p><p>So to change topics a bit, last night while waiting for the seller to show up, I took some test shots with my 35mm prime. I took a shot of a strip mall about 150 feet away under street lighting, and a couple of close-ups of the table I was sitting at. When I got my hands on the 55-200mm, I took a shot of the strip mall zoomed in at 200mm, and a few close-ups. When I reviewed the shots later, I found to some surprise that the zoomed-in shot with the 55-200mm was way sharper than similar crops of the shot I took with the 35mm prime. The shots with the prime also showed purple fringing around neon signs, while the 55-200mm showed none. Not sure if this is common knowledge, but I was under the mistaken impression that images of distant objects with the 35mm prime would be comparably sharp once cropped, but that doesn't seem to be the case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gustafson, post: 494975, member: 40735"] OMG [USER=27586]@hrstrat57[/USER], you slay me! @[URL="http://nikonites.com/member-9252-steveh.html"]SteveH[/URL], thanks for the heads up on the weight not being that big an issue. So to change topics a bit, last night while waiting for the seller to show up, I took some test shots with my 35mm prime. I took a shot of a strip mall about 150 feet away under street lighting, and a couple of close-ups of the table I was sitting at. When I got my hands on the 55-200mm, I took a shot of the strip mall zoomed in at 200mm, and a few close-ups. When I reviewed the shots later, I found to some surprise that the zoomed-in shot with the 55-200mm was way sharper than similar crops of the shot I took with the 35mm prime. The shots with the prime also showed purple fringing around neon signs, while the 55-200mm showed none. Not sure if this is common knowledge, but I was under the mistaken impression that images of distant objects with the 35mm prime would be comparably sharp once cropped, but that doesn't seem to be the case. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3300
Thoughts on 55-200 DX VR lens?
Top