Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D300/D300s
This is a D300 :)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 231851" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>Its great that youre building yourself to move to FF. its an expensive move. not many pros bought the greatest gear in one time. the FF sensor will take your images to another level. the detail and dynamic range. the tones and even the quality of the grain look better than DX. I was with film and used my brothers d300 everytime there was a family event. people were very happy with the pictures. but I never was. I had to tweak it a lot in ps to get the look I was used to dealing with in film. I hate the look of digital. if I had the money, I would buy an analog machine at home, a film developer and just shoot film. the D3 IQ are very satisfactory to my eyes. im not happy with it but im very content. I feel proud when I pass my pictures to the clients and other photogs I work with. reala film on fuji pro matte paper...ugh, to die for. thats the reason I never moved to digital. it looked like crap. today its not there yet, but its getting there. I was like many who said, eh, its good enough. but once I started with FF, wow the IQ is ano another level. theres no comparison between them. not only does it give you freedom to get shots you couldnt get, everything about the image (providing the photographer knows how to photograph hah) is a different level. I said iso2000 with the D300 isnt enough? now with the D3 6400 isnt enough. next year I want to get the D3S for really low light situations. being able to shoot over 6400..upgrading never stops</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 231851, member: 14443"] Its great that youre building yourself to move to FF. its an expensive move. not many pros bought the greatest gear in one time. the FF sensor will take your images to another level. the detail and dynamic range. the tones and even the quality of the grain look better than DX. I was with film and used my brothers d300 everytime there was a family event. people were very happy with the pictures. but I never was. I had to tweak it a lot in ps to get the look I was used to dealing with in film. I hate the look of digital. if I had the money, I would buy an analog machine at home, a film developer and just shoot film. the D3 IQ are very satisfactory to my eyes. im not happy with it but im very content. I feel proud when I pass my pictures to the clients and other photogs I work with. reala film on fuji pro matte paper...ugh, to die for. thats the reason I never moved to digital. it looked like crap. today its not there yet, but its getting there. I was like many who said, eh, its good enough. but once I started with FF, wow the IQ is ano another level. theres no comparison between them. not only does it give you freedom to get shots you couldnt get, everything about the image (providing the photographer knows how to photograph hah) is a different level. I said iso2000 with the D300 isnt enough? now with the D3 6400 isnt enough. next year I want to get the D3S for really low light situations. being able to shoot over 6400..upgrading never stops [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D300/D300s
This is a D300 :)
Top