Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SkvLTD" data-source="post: 365467" data-attributes="member: 12855">Like the artistic slump, when I feel like total #$%^ and have no idea what to really do to get out. Improving my shots would most likely help, and though NAS is never the answer to that, I do want to allocate funds in the long-run benefit instead of eating through them.Choices are: 28-70 2.8 (and sell my 24-85) to complete the workhorse duet and be done w/ lenses for a very good while until/unless,50/1.2 to just own that majestic beast and kick myself into proper manual focusing gear and some really unique and shallow DOF that can only really be done w/ this one.&nbsp;50 would run me way less, but no way to recoup any of the cost and then using it for work would stick me back into prime mode indoors. 28-70 and constant ap would take care of lots of lighting qualms I have w/ 24-85 in low light, so coupled w/ SWM it would make work far easier to do consistently.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SkvLTD, post: 365467, member: 12855"] Like the artistic slump, when I feel like total #$%^ and have no idea what to really do to get out. Improving my shots would most likely help, and though NAS is never the answer to that, I do want to allocate funds in the long-run benefit instead of eating through them. Choices are: 28-70 2.8 (and sell my 24-85) to complete the workhorse duet and be done w/ lenses for a very good while until/unless, 50/1.2 to just own that majestic beast and kick myself into proper manual focusing gear and some really unique and shallow DOF that can only really be done w/ this one. 50 would run me way less, but no way to recoup any of the cost and then using it for work would stick me back into prime mode indoors. 28-70 and constant ap would take care of lots of lighting qualms I have w/ 24-85 in low light, so coupled w/ SWM it would make work far easier to do consistently. [/QUOTE]

Verification