Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Then we push you to a Raynox 250, but that is for another day LOL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Don Kuykendall_RIP" data-source="post: 454198" data-attributes="member: 6277"><p>I just looked at all my lenses. The 18-200 (wife's on her D7000) has a 72mm filter and the raynox 150 or 250 need from 52-67 which would fit my 18-140, 70-300 and my wonderful little 35mm and of course the 40mm Macro.</p><p></p><p>I guess I will give her the 40 and get the raynox 150 or 250 for me. I keep thinking the 250 might be to limiting for me. to close only. sometimes I want the entire flower in the shot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Don Kuykendall_RIP, post: 454198, member: 6277"] I just looked at all my lenses. The 18-200 (wife's on her D7000) has a 72mm filter and the raynox 150 or 250 need from 52-67 which would fit my 18-140, 70-300 and my wonderful little 35mm and of course the 40mm Macro. I guess I will give her the 40 and get the raynox 150 or 250 for me. I keep thinking the 250 might be to limiting for me. to close only. sometimes I want the entire flower in the shot. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Then we push you to a Raynox 250, but that is for another day LOL
Top