Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="§am" data-source="post: 542300" data-attributes="member: 9187">Finally decided to go FX and spend some hard earned cash on a D750.However no torn between which lens to get from the following;Nikon 24-120 f/4Sigma 24-105 f/4 Art lensTamron 24-70 f/2.8All three cover the focus ranges I most use in my photography daily needs (family etc) which makes chosing one even harder than another.If I wanted it for looks, it would be the Sigma - it's a sexy beast of a lens <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />For aesthetics and the whole ecosystem, it would be the Nikon of course.And just because it's superb lens for the price, the Tamron wins of course.Ideally I'd like a 24-100+ f/2.8 for some nice bokeh type shots, but I have my 50mm f/1.8 for that and may be adding a 20mm f/1.8 (Nikon) or 20mm f/1.4 (Sigma A) down the line.Any help/advice much appreciated</blockquote>

[QUOTE="§am, post: 542300, member: 9187"] Finally decided to go FX and spend some hard earned cash on a D750. However no torn between which lens to get from the following; Nikon 24-120 f/4 Sigma 24-105 f/4 Art lens Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 All three cover the focus ranges I most use in my photography daily needs (family etc) which makes chosing one even harder than another. If I wanted it for looks, it would be the Sigma - it's a sexy beast of a lens :) For aesthetics and the whole ecosystem, it would be the Nikon of course. And just because it's superb lens for the price, the Tamron wins of course. Ideally I'd like a 24-100+ f/2.8 for some nice bokeh type shots, but I have my 50mm f/1.8 for that and may be adding a 20mm f/1.8 (Nikon) or 20mm f/1.4 (Sigma A) down the line. Any help/advice much appreciated [/QUOTE]

Verification