Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
The Value of a photo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ohkphoto" data-source="post: 33902" data-attributes="member: 1573"><p>Rick, there's nothing wrong with "giving" away a photo. i.e. print. I do it all the time. When I shoot a session or event, I post a download link on the site. A "personal use" license comes up, so they understand that the photo is for personal use. Prints have to be ordered through me because the copyright symbol is on there . . . fortunately, Walmart and Walgreen do honor that.</p><p></p><p>With regard to what to charge for a commercial license, here's an example as a starting point: Click on this <a href="http://ohkphotography.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/Nature/G0000UoFcqGX5EI0/I0000QEnNtL9aIfE" target="_blank">image </a>and pretend you're going to buy a license. Click on the download tab. There are several options, but for a year's use of this image, <strong>Paid advertising on a website for a company with a national market: $3090</strong>. You can play around with the different options and see immediately how the price changes. (Photoshelter uses "fotoquote" to help photographers set up pricing), Even when I do a wedding, every one of the photos is watermarked and I make it clear that they only get a personal license for the photos.</p><p></p><p>I've had 2 copyright issues in the last month. I'll write about them later. The rant refers a lot to the stock agencies that have popped up (including Getty Images). </p><p></p><p>The bottom line is you have to honor and value your work enough to stand up for it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ohkphoto, post: 33902, member: 1573"] Rick, there's nothing wrong with "giving" away a photo. i.e. print. I do it all the time. When I shoot a session or event, I post a download link on the site. A "personal use" license comes up, so they understand that the photo is for personal use. Prints have to be ordered through me because the copyright symbol is on there . . . fortunately, Walmart and Walgreen do honor that. With regard to what to charge for a commercial license, here's an example as a starting point: Click on this [URL="http://ohkphotography.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/Nature/G0000UoFcqGX5EI0/I0000QEnNtL9aIfE"]image [/URL]and pretend you're going to buy a license. Click on the download tab. There are several options, but for a year's use of this image, [B]Paid advertising on a website for a company with a national market: $3090[/B]. You can play around with the different options and see immediately how the price changes. (Photoshelter uses "fotoquote" to help photographers set up pricing), Even when I do a wedding, every one of the photos is watermarked and I make it clear that they only get a personal license for the photos. I've had 2 copyright issues in the last month. I'll write about them later. The rant refers a lot to the stock agencies that have popped up (including Getty Images). The bottom line is you have to honor and value your work enough to stand up for it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
The Value of a photo
Top