Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Blade Canyon" data-source="post: 531232" data-attributes="member: 15302">Thank you for posting that article.&nbsp; It had some good ideas about advanced composition, but some of the things he was using to demonstrate his point for other techniques also followed the Rule Of Thirds in a general way.&nbsp; The first three photos under Myth 1 followed the Rule of Thirds, even if they also used other composition techniques.&nbsp; That statue of Laocoon and His Sons does, too, and the Annie Liebovitz pic.&nbsp; And the Lautrec final painting.&nbsp; Etc.And, his &quot;Rule of Thirds&quot; photos that he didn't like were just bad compositions.&nbsp; The woman by herself in the stream was on the left side of the photo and was gazing to the left, out of the picture.&nbsp; Had she been facing the other way, even without the &quot;counterpart&quot;, it would have been much more pleasing.&nbsp; Some of the other photos were good, even though he didn't like them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Blade Canyon, post: 531232, member: 15302"] Thank you for posting that article. It had some good ideas about advanced composition, but some of the things he was using to demonstrate his point for other techniques also followed the Rule Of Thirds in a general way. The first three photos under Myth 1 followed the Rule of Thirds, even if they also used other composition techniques. That statue of Laocoon and His Sons does, too, and the Annie Liebovitz pic. And the Lautrec final painting. Etc. And, his "Rule of Thirds" photos that he didn't like were just bad compositions. The woman by herself in the stream was on the left side of the photo and was gazing to the left, out of the picture. Had she been facing the other way, even without the "counterpart", it would have been much more pleasing. Some of the other photos were good, even though he didn't like them. [/QUOTE]

Verification