Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D750
The Right Order of Things-DX first, then FX?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="daveward" data-source="post: 650497" data-attributes="member: 43951"><p>I am one of those folks who over-analyze stuff...and in the case of cameras...it gets even worse. I got back into the hobby after a kids-growing-up-hiatus and decided after extensive research in 2014 to get a used but nearly new D90 with 800 shutter actuations. Three years later, I have been yearning for a D7200 but I keep thinking about the great probability one day I'll go full-frame.</p><p> </p><p>So...why not just jump all the way to a D750, I ask? Looking at some of the experienced folks here it's clear that having both a DX and FX is fairly common. But is it necessary to get that nice DX (D7200) before jumping to full-frame?</p><p></p><p>Here are my real questions: should I be concerned with the shutter recall issue of the D750...and if so does that mean I should avoid used D750's? Or would a used one with a new shutter be good, as al the kinks would be worked out? If I get a new D750 does that guarantee no shutter issues? (Here I'm wondering how long a product could sit on a shelf before being sold)</p><p></p><p>Also, I'll just say that I am not committed lens-wise to DX or FX yet...as the only lens I have is a 50mm 1.4 that I bought to work on both DX and FX cameras. I do not have a photographic "style" except to say if I had one it would be aimed at landscapes and portraits. </p><p></p><p>So, what are the things that would worry you about buying a D750 today? Thanks!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="daveward, post: 650497, member: 43951"] I am one of those folks who over-analyze stuff...and in the case of cameras...it gets even worse. I got back into the hobby after a kids-growing-up-hiatus and decided after extensive research in 2014 to get a used but nearly new D90 with 800 shutter actuations. Three years later, I have been yearning for a D7200 but I keep thinking about the great probability one day I'll go full-frame. So...why not just jump all the way to a D750, I ask? Looking at some of the experienced folks here it's clear that having both a DX and FX is fairly common. But is it necessary to get that nice DX (D7200) before jumping to full-frame? Here are my real questions: should I be concerned with the shutter recall issue of the D750...and if so does that mean I should avoid used D750's? Or would a used one with a new shutter be good, as al the kinks would be worked out? If I get a new D750 does that guarantee no shutter issues? (Here I'm wondering how long a product could sit on a shelf before being sold) Also, I'll just say that I am not committed lens-wise to DX or FX yet...as the only lens I have is a 50mm 1.4 that I bought to work on both DX and FX cameras. I do not have a photographic "style" except to say if I had one it would be aimed at landscapes and portraits. So, what are the things that would worry you about buying a D750 today? Thanks!!! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D750
The Right Order of Things-DX first, then FX?
Top