Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
The Recycling of Lens Design By Nikon 24-84 3.3 AFS ED
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stmv" data-source="post: 66353" data-attributes="member: 10038"><p>Also, I am excited about this copy, sounds like a great walkaround lens. I usually carry a 20-35 and a 35-70 as my walkaround, but this new 24-85 single lens will really have this range covered. Light weight, and optically well rated. </p><p></p><p>I really don't like bulky heavy lens. I have a 80-200 2.8, and while a lovely lens, hardly ever use it, its a tank. I have checked out some of the newer Nikkor 2.8 zooms, and their weight (besides high cost) discourages me from buying. In a studio, or a non mobile outside venue -> sure , but walking around 4-6 hours, I really prefer the lighter weight zooms or primes. </p><p></p><p>So, from I can tell, the old 24-85 AFS,, or for those that want the VR version, might be an excellent choice for some. I'll post some shots once I get the lens. and provide feedback of what I think of the lens. </p><p></p><p>I really love the 35-70 (although my copy is getting worn out), so, I will be comparing it to that, or my primes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stmv, post: 66353, member: 10038"] Also, I am excited about this copy, sounds like a great walkaround lens. I usually carry a 20-35 and a 35-70 as my walkaround, but this new 24-85 single lens will really have this range covered. Light weight, and optically well rated. I really don't like bulky heavy lens. I have a 80-200 2.8, and while a lovely lens, hardly ever use it, its a tank. I have checked out some of the newer Nikkor 2.8 zooms, and their weight (besides high cost) discourages me from buying. In a studio, or a non mobile outside venue -> sure , but walking around 4-6 hours, I really prefer the lighter weight zooms or primes. So, from I can tell, the old 24-85 AFS,, or for those that want the VR version, might be an excellent choice for some. I'll post some shots once I get the lens. and provide feedback of what I think of the lens. I really love the 35-70 (although my copy is getting worn out), so, I will be comparing it to that, or my primes. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
The Recycling of Lens Design By Nikon 24-84 3.3 AFS ED
Top