Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
The Purist
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Browncoat" data-source="post: 9952" data-attributes="member: 1061"><p>The short version: Yes.</p><p></p><p>The long version:</p><p></p><p>We've touched on this topic in a couple different threads, and it's one that will continue to come up in the photography industry as a whole, now and forever. The "purist" wants validation for their skill, as does the "post processor". I would argue that there is no such thing as a pure anymore, especially when shooting digital. Even the film gurus are always looking for an edge in the darkroom to produce better quality photos. If something is truly pure, there's no need to try to define it at all, it just "is".</p><p></p><p>While I admire those who are aperture savvy, who take the time to set up the perfect shot...in my mind, there's a better/faster alternative. But that's just my experience vs. theirs. While I can breeze through Photoshop, some are honestly intimidated by it. While some shooters can make instant f/stop calculations in their heads to set everything up in-camera, I can't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Browncoat, post: 9952, member: 1061"] The short version: Yes. The long version: We've touched on this topic in a couple different threads, and it's one that will continue to come up in the photography industry as a whole, now and forever. The "purist" wants validation for their skill, as does the "post processor". I would argue that there is no such thing as a pure anymore, especially when shooting digital. Even the film gurus are always looking for an edge in the darkroom to produce better quality photos. If something is truly pure, there's no need to try to define it at all, it just "is". While I admire those who are aperture savvy, who take the time to set up the perfect shot...in my mind, there's a better/faster alternative. But that's just my experience vs. theirs. While I can breeze through Photoshop, some are honestly intimidated by it. While some shooters can make instant f/stop calculations in their heads to set everything up in-camera, I can't. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
The Purist
Top