Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
The Purist
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruidoso Bill" data-source="post: 9926" data-attributes="member: 753"><p>I agree about techniques (speed, shuuter, aperture) remain the same. I can remember how bad I felt after spending what seemed to be hours perfecting a print only to notice I left something that could have been cropped or dodged. The need for larger neagatives is very similar to the need for higher pixel count.</p><p> </p><p>Crap then = Crap now (or nicer crap).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruidoso Bill, post: 9926, member: 753"] I agree about techniques (speed, shuuter, aperture) remain the same. I can remember how bad I felt after spending what seemed to be hours perfecting a print only to notice I left something that could have been cropped or dodged. The need for larger neagatives is very similar to the need for higher pixel count. Crap then = Crap now (or nicer crap). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
The Purist
Top
