Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ohkphoto" data-source="post: 176728" data-attributes="member: 1573">That's a statement, I'm sure has never crossed the minds of these media &quot;outlets.&quot;I think there will always be &quot;quality publications&quot; that value the quality and integrity of good photojournalists.&nbsp; I don't count daily newspapers as &quot;quality publications.&quot;&nbsp; -- they're fighting to just survive.&nbsp; . . and then you have the major networks who devote entire segments to what's trending on Twitter, etc.&nbsp; Remember the days when &quot;breaking news&quot; happened on the major TV networks or on the radio?&nbsp; Today, it happens on Twitter first.&nbsp; News reporting has changed.Eventually the pendulum will swing the other way, at least I hope.&nbsp; And Jake is absolutely correct.&nbsp; I don't remember any of the stupid Twit or FB photos of news events.&nbsp; But I do those extraordinary captures by incredibly talented photojournalists . . . you know, the ones that Getty lusts after.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ohkphoto, post: 176728, member: 1573"] That's a statement, I'm sure has never crossed the minds of these media "outlets." I think there will always be "quality publications" that value the quality and integrity of good photojournalists. I don't count daily newspapers as "quality publications." -- they're fighting to just survive. . . and then you have the major networks who devote entire segments to what's trending on Twitter, etc. Remember the days when "breaking news" happened on the major TV networks or on the radio? Today, it happens on Twitter first. News reporting has changed. Eventually the pendulum will swing the other way, at least I hope. And Jake is absolutely correct. I don't remember any of the stupid Twit or FB photos of news events. But I do those extraordinary captures by incredibly talented photojournalists . . . you know, the ones that Getty lusts after. [/QUOTE]

Verification